Adpact vs Dokira
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Adpact compared with Dokira
| Detail |
Adpact |
Dokira |
| What it does | Book Telegram channel ads with payment protected by smart contract escrow on TON
| Ad network for premium publishers
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| AT
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Paid
|
|---|
| Pricing | 10% of successful paid deals; 6% for channels with an Adpact link in description or running an Adpact promo post
| Revenue share model: publishers receive 80% of net revenue. No setup fee.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Automated bot posting and verification
- Fixed channel pricing with queue estimates
- Refund if ad fails to publish or is deleted
- Cross-promotion with points instead of money
- Channel owner approval mode
- Referral program with fee sharing
- Support for 15 languages
- TON Connect wallet integration
| - 18 demand partners competing on every impression
- Google AdX integration
- Single tag integration
- Private marketplace deals for US inventory
- No ads.txt management required
- Optional Google Ad Manager integration
- Transparent revenue reporting
- Automated in-content ad placement planning
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Objective automated verification with no support tickets needed
- Free cross-promotion growth without ad budget
| - Hand-tuned setup and ongoing optimisation by a real person instead of templates
- High revenue share at 80 percent
- Verified, transparent figures without benchmarking claims
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 10 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 7 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 11 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Adpact More alternatives to Dokira