CodeToPDF vs eryx
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
CodeToPDF compared with eryx
| Detail | 
CodeToPDF | 
eryx |
|---|
| What it does | Free developer tools for code conversion, formatting, and utilities
| WebAssembly sandbox for running untrusted Python safely
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2024
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | All tools are free with no paid plans, credits, or paywalls.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Code-to-PDF conversion with syntax highlighting for 50+ languages
- Multiple PDF themes including Dracula, Monokai, GitHub, and VS Code
- JWT decoder for token inspection
- UUID generator with bulk generation up to 100
- Regex tester with live match highlighting
- SQL formatter supporting multiple database systems
- QR code generator with customizable output
| - Full CPython 3.14 with standard library
- Async callbacks from sandboxed code
- No filesystem or network unless allowed
- Fast startup in 1–5 milliseconds
- Embed from Python, JavaScript or Rust
- MCP server support
- gRPC server deployment
- Hosted execution over HTTP and WebSocket
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Completely free with no hidden paywalls or credit limits
- No account or signup required for any tool
- Client-side tools run entirely in your browser with zero data transmission
- Instant results with most tools producing output as you type
- Server-side files permanently deleted immediately after processing
| - Full CPython 3.14 running in WebAssembly
- Async callbacks between sandbox and host
- Extremely fast sandbox startup
- Works as MCP server for AI agents
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 18 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 8 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 6 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 12 | 2 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to CodeToPDF More alternatives to eryx