Live carbon intensity and day-ahead power prices for European data centres, refreshed every ten minutes
App and game review analyzer showing what users love, why they leave and what they ask for
Stage
Not given
Startup
Founded
Not given
2026
Based in
CH
US
Pricing model
Not given
Freemium
Pricing
Free account with one project. Premium: EUR 49 per month or EUR 490 per year per user, excluding VAT. First subscription includes 7 days free trial.
Free: 3 reports per month up to 500 reviews each, no card needed. Pro: $19 per month or $190 per year, up to 5,000 reviews per report. Max: $49 per month or $490 per year, up to 25,000 reviews per report.
Key features
Pipeline tracker with 477 data centre projects across 24 countries
Site finder for European data centre locations by power and grid
Market pages for 31 European data centre markets with grid carbon and power rules
Grid connection tracker for 17 countries showing connection queues and capacity rules
AI connector MCP server for integration with Claude and ChatGPT
Dated figures with sources from official bodies and public records
Fibre latency calculator for round-trip latency between 20 European hubs
Shows what users love with praise themes
Identifies complaint themes ranked by share and severity
Extracts feature requests sorted by type and theme
Tracks sentiment changes over time with weekly and monthly trends
Identifies review bombs and spikes by code
Shows audience segments like new users versus veterans
Connects to App Store Connect and Play Console to reply to reviews
Integrates with Claude, Codex or Cursor via MCP in beta
What makes it different
One workspace integrating site selection, grid data, build costs, operating costs and sale scenarios
No vendor or operator pays to appear in rankings, directories or articles
Every number opens the reviews it was counted from, so findings are verifiable
Uses fixed questions and code counting rather than estimated numbers from chatbots
Covers Steam games alongside App Store and Google Play apps
Priced for individuals rather than teams requiring procurement