deploybase vs Staxa
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
deploybase compared with Staxa
| Detail | 
deploybase | 
Staxa |
|---|
| What it does | European static site hosting and serverless functions with git builds, branch previews, and instant rollback
| Multi-tenant infrastructure platform for isolated customer environments
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | NL
| JM
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: €0/month (1 site, 100 GB bandwidth, 200 build minutes, 100 form submissions). Starter: €9/month or €86/year (10 sites, 500 GB bandwidth, 1,000 build minutes, 1,000 form submissions). Pro: €19/month or €182/year (25 sites, 1 TB bandwidth, 3,000 build minutes, 5,000 form submissions, unlimited m
| Free: 2 tenants, $0. Starter: $49/month (5 tenants). Growth: $199/month (25 tenants). Scale: $799/month (100 tenants). Extra tenants: $8/month on Starter, $7/month on Growth, $5/month on Scale.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Git-connected builds
- Branch previews with unique URLs
- Instant rollback to any deployment
- Custom domains with automatic TLS
- Form submissions without backend
- Serverless functions at own hostname
- AI agent deployment via MCP
- OpenID Connect single sign-on
- EU data processing with named subprocessors
- Site analytics from CDN logs
| - Namespace isolation per tenant with network policies and resource quotas
- Full REST API for programmatic tenant provisioning and management
- Point-and-click dashboard for deploying without terminal or YAML
- Automatic subdomain and SSL certificate provisioning
- Deployment rollbacks and configuration changes without rebuilds
- Live streaming build logs for all deployment stages
- Support for 35+ application templates across 9 languages
- Auto-detection of popular frameworks and Dockerfile support
- Private container registry integration
- Network rules and policies per tenant
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - All data stays in EU with no US cloud providers
- Flat pricing in euros with no per-seat charges
- Production as immutable pointer with instant rollback
- Serverless functions that scale to zero
| - No infrastructure knowledge required - dashboard and API work without kubectl
- Complete isolation at Kubernetes namespace level prevents tenant interference
- Every action available both via dashboard and REST API for flexibility
- Free tier includes 2 complete isolated tenants to start immediately
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 25 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 8 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 1 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 18 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 60 | 7 |
|---|
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to deploybase More alternatives to Staxa