ghfs vs eryx

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

ghfs compared with eryx
Detail	ghfs	eryx
What it does	GitHub Issues as local files for coding agents	WebAssembly sandbox for running untrusted Python safely
Stage	Startup	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Open source
Pricing	Free: 1 repository, issues, background sync. Hobby: $5/mo or $48/yr (save 20%), unlimited repositories, all issues, background sync. Pro: $15/mo or $144/yr (save 20%), everything in Hobby plus projects, discussions, and pull requests (coming soon). Enterprise: contact for pricing.	Not given
Key features	Project-level AI rules - Write configuration files for Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and other agents Three-command setup - curl, ghfs init, and ghfs to get started	Full CPython 3.14 with standard library Async callbacks from sandboxed code No filesystem or network unless allowed Fast startup in 1–5 milliseconds Embed from Python, JavaScript or Rust MCP server support gRPC server deployment Hosted execution over HTTP and WebSocket
What makes it different	Read-only design guarantees no unintended issue modifications	Full CPython 3.14 running in WebAssembly Async callbacks between sandbox and host Extremely fast sandbox startup Works as MCP server for AI agents
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	15	6
Referring domains (Majestic)	16	2

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to ghfs More alternatives to eryx