SEOCode vs quietwatch
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Framework-aware SEO and AI crawler checks inside your GitHub pull requests | Daily checks that catch noindex tags, robots.txt blocks and crawler visibility issues on client sites before the client notices |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | GB | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Developer: Free for unlimited public repositories, CLI and MCP server. Studio: $190/year (or $19/month) per GitHub organization for unlimited private repositories, team alerts, and priority support. | Free instant checks available. Founding: $19/month for first 10 customers (up to 10 sites, locked 12 months). Starter: $29/month or $279/year (up to 10 sites, email alerts). Agency: $49/month or $470/year (up to 30 sites, Slack and webhook alerts). All plans include 14-day free trial. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 3 +1 (up) since last check | 2 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 20 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8 | 6 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to SEOCode More alternatives to quietwatch