Silent Fail vs PingWise
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | A dead-man's switch for n8n, Make and Zapier that alerts you when your workflows stop running | Quorum-based uptime monitoring from 15 probes on 6 continents |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | GR |
| Pricing model | Not given | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free plan: 3 monitors, no judged checks. Solo: $9/month for 25 monitors, 1,000 judged checks per month. Pro: $29/month for unlimited monitors, 1,000 judged checks per month included. Additional check packs available: $10 for 1,000 checks, $40 for 5,000 checks, $70 for 10,000 checks. | 650,000 free credits monthly, then prepaid packs from €5. A 1-minute monitor uses 43,200 credits/month. Bought credits valid for 24 months. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | 15 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 4 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 20 | 1 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Silent Fail More alternatives to PingWise