SpiderFoot.tools vs Agentmetry
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
SpiderFoot.tools compared with Agentmetry
| Detail | 
SpiderFoot.tools | 
Agentmetry |
|---|
| What it does | Not given
| Open-source security for AI coding agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| GR
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Open-source sensor is free. Enterprise pilot for up to 25 developer seats starts with a 90-day design-partner pilot, scoped with you.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Username checks across 2,518 sites in 17 categories
- IP network context from Cloudflare Radar
- Privacy Search mode to prevent scan history
- Real-time scan progress updates
- Public-web context search results
- Account-context signals for email
- Multiple input types: username, email, IP address
| - Records tool calls from Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot and other agents
- Detects risky sequences and agent behavior patterns
- Forwards to SIEM: Splunk, Elastic, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps
- MCP server scanning to detect risky or malicious integrations
- Works on Windows, Linux and macOS without kernel driver
- DLP integration to prevent credential and sensitive data exfiltration
- 0 false positives across 57 test cases with MITRE ATT&CK coverage
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No local installation required; runs entirely in browser
- Transparent scan workflow with visible methodology
- Independent from the SpiderFoot open-source project
- Clearly distinguishes results as leads requiring verification
| - Hash-chained records can be verified offline, catching any tampering or editing attempts
- Sees which AI agent ran the command and the session it belongs to, unlike EDR tools
- No account required, no telemetry sent until you configure a sink
- Single maintainer, self-funded, built in public with no hidden development
- All claims on the website verifiable by running commands on your own machine
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 12 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 36 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 23 | 18 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 21 | 45 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to SpiderFoot.tools More alternatives to Agentmetry