Staxa vs lla.ma Apps
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Staxa compared with lla.ma Apps
| Detail | 
Staxa | LA
lla.ma Apps |
|---|
| What it does | Multi-tenant infrastructure platform for isolated customer environments
| Self-hosted deploy console — your own Vercel.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | JM
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: 2 tenants, $0. Starter: $49/month (5 tenants). Growth: $199/month (25 tenants). Scale: $799/month (100 tenants). Extra tenants: $8/month on Starter, $7/month on Growth, $5/month on Scale.
| Free: 1 project, 100 GB bandwidth, community support. Developer: $29/month for 10 projects, 1 TB bandwidth, custom domains, deploy rollbacks. Team: $99/month for unlimited projects, 5 TB bandwidth, team seats, priority support. Enterprise: Custom pricing for dedicated infrastructure, SSO, SLA.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Namespace isolation per tenant with network policies and resource quotas
- Full REST API for programmatic tenant provisioning and management
- Point-and-click dashboard for deploying without terminal or YAML
- Automatic subdomain and SSL certificate provisioning
- Deployment rollbacks and configuration changes without rebuilds
- Live streaming build logs for all deployment stages
- Support for 35+ application templates across 9 languages
- Auto-detection of popular frameworks and Dockerfile support
- Private container registry integration
- Network rules and policies per tenant
| - Framework auto-detection for Next.js, static sites, and Dockerfile
- Push-to-deploy from GitHub
- Auto-HTTPS with Let's Encrypt certificates
- Live build logs streamed during deployment
- Deploy history and one-click rollbacks
- Environment variable management
- Custom domain support
- Docker and Caddy management
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No infrastructure knowledge required - dashboard and API work without kubectl
- Complete isolation at Kubernetes namespace level prevents tenant interference
- Every action available both via dashboard and REST API for flexibility
- Free tier includes 2 complete isolated tenants to start immediately
| - Flat monthly pricing with no build-minute meters or bandwidth charges
- Choose between self-hosting or cloud with the same underlying engine
- Open-source self-hosted option under Apache 2.0
- No vendor lock-in with self-hosting capability
- Automatic infrastructure management and maintenance
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 8 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 18 | 16 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 7 | 21 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Staxa More alternatives to lla.ma Apps