TokenRa vs Pidgeon
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Chinese AI API Aggregator with one key for multiple providers | Email inboxes for AI agents |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | EE |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | No platform subscription fee. Text models billed per 1M tokens (input, output, and cached reads counted separately). Image models billed per request. Minimum top-up is $10. Example rates: Kimi K3.1 Pro $8/M tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.836/M tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash free until Oct 31 2026, | Hobby: €0/month (3,000 emails/month, unlimited inboxes, 1 custom domain, 3 GB storage). Builder: €20/month (10,000 emails/month, unlimited custom domains, 10 GB storage, 3 team members). Startup: €200/month (500,000 emails/month, unlimited custom domains, 100 GB storage, unlimited team members, 25 t |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 34 +1 (up) since last check | 28 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 7 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 31 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 20 | 51 |
5 details filled in for both companies.