ClipStills vs Swiftlook
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Extract video frames at original dimensions and save locally without watermarks | Screen sharing for phone-based sales teams without download or signup |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: no cost, includes one video and up to 12 images, original-size JPG and PNG without watermarks, ZIP downloads, automatic local draft and project saving. Pro: $19 USD one-time payment, includes multiple videos, assisted image review with similar groups and scene suggestions, contact sheets, cust | Solo $24.99/month with unlimited meetings and up to 20 viewers. Team per-seat from $22.99/seat/month (graduated: seats 1 at $24.99, seats 2–10 at $22.99, seats 11–50 at $19.99, seats 51+ at $17.99), or Team per-meeting from $89.99/month for 100 meetings up to $1,249.99/month for 2,000 meetings. Ente |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ClipStills More alternatives to Swiftlook