SpiderFoot.tools vs ZenVeil
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
SpiderFoot.tools compared with ZenVeil
| Detail |
SpiderFoot.tools |
ZenVeil |
| What it does | Not given
| Security scanner for AI-generated code that catches secrets, CVEs, and OWASP vulnerabilities in under 30 seconds and auto-fixes with GitHub PRs
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free tier for public repositories with 3 scans per hour; paid plans available for private repositories and higher scan limits
|
|---|
| Key features | - Username checks across 2,518 sites in 17 categories
- IP network context from Cloudflare Radar
- Privacy Search mode to prevent scan history
- Real-time scan progress updates
- Public-web context search results
- Account-context signals for email
- Multiple input types: username, email, IP address
| - Secret detection with 200+ credential patterns
- CVE vulnerability scanning via OSV.dev
- OWASP Top 10 coverage
- Automated GitHub PR remediation
- AI-powered fix explanations
- Supply chain security analysis
- API security scanning
- CLI and CI/CD integration
- Read-only ephemeral scanning
- Scans complete in under 30 seconds
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No local installation required; runs entirely in browser
- Transparent scan workflow with visible methodology
- Independent from the SpiderFoot open-source project
- Clearly distinguishes results as leads requiring verification
| - Tuned detection rules for AI-generated code failure modes rather than generic vulnerability patterns
- Specific vulnerability detection for each major AI coding tool including Copilot, Cursor, and Claude
- Automated remediation with GitHub PR creation requiring no manual triage
- Full scans in under 30 seconds with code never stored or used for training
- Fills security gaps that existing tools like Snyk and Semgrep were not designed for
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 12 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 23 | 13 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 21 | 40 |
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to SpiderFoot.tools More alternatives to ZenVeil