Wave.video vs Swiftlook
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | All-in-one online video platform for creating, editing, recording, and hosting videos | Screen sharing for phone-based sales teams without download or signup |
| Stage | Established | Startup |
| Founded | 2011 | Not given |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free plan at $0/month; Streamer at $16/month; Creator at $24/month; Business at $48/month. Annual billing offers 20% discount. Free plan includes 15-minute videos with watermark and 2 million stock assets. Creator plan supports 30-minute videos. Business plan supports up to 2 hours and 60fps. | Solo $24.99/month with unlimited meetings and up to 20 viewers. Team per-seat from $22.99/seat/month (graduated: seats 1 at $24.99, seats 2–10 at $22.99, seats 11–50 at $19.99, seats 51+ at $17.99), or Team per-meeting from $89.99/month for 100 meetings up to $1,249.99/month for 2,000 meetings. Ente |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 76 no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 46 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 3785 | 0 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Wave.video More alternatives to Swiftlook